Another M10 fetish. I cant keep it my business partner has vetoed that idea. Its funny, the M262 seems to be the Leica camera that people forget. !if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_13',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); One way or another, in the time Ive been using the camera, Ive not got used to this little issue, though I have at least learned to live with it. I cant even work out how to hold the Leica M240 for video, and whilst it has focus peaking, it certainly doesnt have the features the Atomos brings to the table. Well worth seeking out. Leica M262 M-P M10 M262 Leica M-E . Can you compare side by side, please? The firmware adds 6-bit code support and correction profiles for new lenses . Sometimes, colours from M262 can be a bit more saturated than from M240, but as I use them only in recording DNG, post work can do what I want. Having said that, I think the M262 could be a perfect digital rangefinder camera for those looking for a minimal film-camera like digital Leica experience and not needing live view or other features. Although it may be possible to choose among other frame rates, those recordings usually have lower resolutions. It serves specific duty now, monochrome and infrared imaging only. It usesa 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor witha near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. It has been a bit of an adjustment shooting with such a stripped-down camera but Im really learning to love it a lot. Any help you learned people would be able to give me as to M240 vs M262 and a good lenswould be invaluable and very much appreciated. But, when my M262 needed to go to German camera hospital for what I guessed might be a significant amount of time (as is often the case), I figured I had little to loose trying out an M240 for a few weeks/months. I am sure you have seen the funny Video of Kai Wong:https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, I have indeed, thanks, I shall take another look its been a while!Sounds like youve made a good choice!I have recently picked up a TL to use along side the forthcoming M10 they both use the same Visoflex, Im going to take the charitable route here but Pera Detlics comment may be interpreted as Leicas are expensive and Pera doesnt have the matching skill set to justify buying one.I also feel that way. You can post now and register later. The view taken by some Leica users when the M240 was released was that features like live-view and video had no place on a Leica. : Leica M240 . Both should arrived this coming week and so I am getting very excited! For me, theres no place for a comment like Peras. I also dont shoot flash and I dont bracket, so really the only part of the set-menu thats of use to me is the ISO settings, and the ISO settings have their own dedicated button. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Leica M6 Classic & Leica M6 TTL A Review of Both Variants, Leica M8 (Finally) Falling in love with this aging digital By Taffy Ledesma, Leica IIf Red Dial: Nostalgia, or Tool for Serious Storytelling? Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Have a read of this for tips. Every other brand talks about new improved this, and added or increased that. Thorsten Overgaard recently posted two comparative X-Rite colorchecker images that show the colour differences between the 262 and 240 which sold me on the 262. For me and my tastes though, the Leica M262 does feel like an advancement from the M240. The Leica M9/ M8 B&W JPEGs can be created 95-99% in camera and I would say my black and white film images are 88% in camera/film developing, 2% scanning, 10% in computer to remove dust and do any basic darkroom style adjustments. My first surprise was as any Leica M240 user would likely tell you just how familiar it felt. With sensor shift, the image sensor (rather than the lens) moves to counterbalance any vibration of the camera. At 0.68 magnification itll be hard to push to 75mm without a magnifier eyepiece x1.25 or x1.4. - and the M240 in color. I just bought a M262.Its my 3rd Leica M (after a M6 and a M240) and each time I come back to a M, its a delight. The shutter and cocking mechanism are much quieter than in the earlier and higher-priced M Typ 240, and allow two frames per second to be recorded in single shot mode. At which point I bought a stand-in M240 and I discovered the joys of live view on an m-mount Leica. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. Literally. As the cameras are meant to have identical sensors, do we think this is just new owner's biased impressions (nothing wrong with that btw) is could there be something in this? Weight savings from the M10 may be there, but with a Thumbs Up in the hot shoe, the M240 feels good and substantial in the hand.ISO setting. So I still have ways to go to become a true minimalist! Which despite it feeling like something that would really suit me as someone who prefers to operate without the need for any sort of menu driven interface on their cameras was still a fairly small feature for quite a lot more cash!if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); As such I bought an M262 and fairly happily got on with shooting it for the best part of a year. Without a magnifier piececomfortable view is 50-35mm. It uses a 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor with a near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. I think either will be a fine way into a Leica. I could get myself in position where something was about to happen, use the rangefinder or live-view to pick a point of focus, then whilst looking at the back of the camera I could use my peripheral vision to judge the timing of whatever I was taking a photo of whilst maintaining focus confirmation.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_17',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); I do this all the time with the Sony cameras, yet had never joined the dots and worked out that it might be something Id enjoy or find use for with a rangefinder. Live-view with any lens I liked was fun. For compact cameras, a focus motor is usually built-in. I keep looking at the 262 as a hidden gem. (and more M ) when I look at results, there is no difference as they share same sensor. The sensor is not the same, by the way. Help us by suggesting a value. Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. When using the M10 in aperture priority mode I dial the EV down to -0.7. Shedding some light on the sources of noise, Our favorite gear, rewarded: DPReview Awards 2022, Leica adds 12-bit Cinema 4K Raw video output, improved AF features and more to its SL2-S, A closer look at the Leica M11 (photo gallery), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro Sample Gallery, Fujifilm X-T5 production sample gallery (DPReview TV), DPReview TV: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM Review, DPReview TV: Sony 50mm F1.4 GM vs Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG DN Art, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. I have not seen that anywhere in the promotional material. To make pictures, those are good bodies to be used with good lens. I dont have and 6-bit coded lenses, or really bother with the coding, so just tend to set the minimum speed to 1/60th. Intro Sample Images Lenses Specs Performance. I love the colors from the sensor as a whole, but one thing I dont like is rendering of skin tones. - 35mmc, https://matthewtrader.com/leica-m262-review-after-photographing-my-nieces-5th-birthday-party, Nikon 28ti and 35ti - Mini-Review - By Ahmed Al Shorouqi, 5 frames with the Nikon FM2 & Agfa APX 400 in my Paris - By Martina Rigotti, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. May be different sensor calibration? Then I bought an early mirrorless camera possibly a Panasonic or Sony, I cant remember which came first and I had to eat a load of humble pie. Leica has used the button space on the rear of the camera that is used for live view in the Typ 240 to add direct access to the white balance feature. In the real world, I was making the M9 work for me in terms of low light shooting, as such, I have literally never found a single issue with high ISO noise from the M262. People get all gnarled up about refresh rates and such, but the M240s EVF is fine for its limited uses.Focus Peaking. But nope, they included a hardly useful flourish, that as you say, looks like it was thought up but a marketing department. It is certainly one of the most economical full frame digital Leica M cameras out there, however, still a very expensive camera, even used. From what I understand the M10 has substantially improved this feature and this is an attractive change. as first digital Leica M, I'd take M (typ 262) but if the M (typ240) is cheaper, go ahead. Source: DxOMark. By Edit: Since writing this I have been made aware that pressing and holding the ISO button is the quickest way to change ISO. The Leica M262 feels to me like almost everything anyone could or should expect from a digital Leica rangefinder. The type of viewfinder that the camera has. The wider width of the M240 has never bothered me but the new M10 does look good a little slimmed down. The Leica M-D (Typ 262) ($5,995) is the camera for photographers who wish that digital didn't happen. I admit, Im a bit of a snob with stills cameras. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. The Leica M10-R rangefinder camera has a newly developed 40 megapixel sensor that represents a big increase from the 24 megapixels of the previous M10 model. A blessing in some ways, though frustratingly its taken the edge off a feature Ive enjoyed more than I expected to. In fact, apart from INFO button/screen which reports battery and SD card information, and the play and delete buttons, the ISO button and the menu it brings up is really the only part of the screen-based interface I use. It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good? The M9 and CCD sensor. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. For the M240, forget it. The model omits the Typ 240's live view and video capabilities, and has a much simpler menu structure and one-button access to . USA Distributor of MCM Equipment leica m240 vs m262 image quality I was once very happy with my M9. Hmm I wonder if you might be right there. Phase-detection autofocus is much faster than a contrast detection autofocus, allowing for sharper images. In the run up to buying an M10 Ive been reading a lot of reviews, and have found the M262 is rarely mentioned in them. An electronic viewfinder (EVF) with a higher resolution provides a sharper image, producing a view comparable in quality with the one displayed on an optical viewfinder. And thats pushing it. Both were taken at 3200 ISO to try and exaggerate any image quality issues. My biggest problem with the digital M bodies is I cant use my Summicron DR on them (although, havent tested it on an M10 yet). I cant. On the Leica M262 the thumb dial can be set to control exposure compensation. I love the files the camera produces, the size and weight is just right and operationally it couldnt be much simpler. Battery power, or battery capacity, represents the amount of electrical energy that a battery can store. Hi everyone. One video compares the sound of the shutter to the the M-E. Jump to content . The M262 was the stripped-back camera that came after the M240 and before the M10 and as regular readers of this website will know, I do like a stripped-back camera.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Leica must have listened to some of their users who felt that they didnt need a lot of the features that the Leica M240 offered them, and created a camera that felt a little more like a natural progression from the M9. Leaving aside the video recording, the main difference is the simplified menu of the 262 v the live view of the 240. The M240 is wide and bulky. In a world where newer camera models are expected to have more features not less, the Leica M262 doesnt really fit into the normal upgrade path camera manufacturers offer. Ive spent the last month or so shooting with a Leica M [typ 240]. This made me think; maybe I could get on with the video features too? The 262 probably has a more stable power management, resulting in less banding and thus better high ISO performance. You mirror my sentiments about the camera to a t! The number of megapixels determines the resolution of the images captured with the main camera. Material choices as well as the overall fit and finish are second to none. My primary reasons for upgrading were: better high ISO capabilities ie. Manage Settings Its. What is the highest ISO you are comfortable with the 240/262?I find the focus peaking on my M10 better than the Sonys Ive used. Aluminium body makes is nice and light. It has a better screen, live-view, no video and even has a ISO dial (like you might find on a Fuji). I could sell the M262, and my beloved Monochrom (and maybe a couple of lenses), thus satisfying the GAS problem and simultaneously slimming down my cameras without actually having to spend any more money or as my mate James would say, I could make this a revenue-neutral purchase. Thank you @Jeff Sfor this and also your sage comments re not having to use video and not having to use LV on the M240. Funnily enough, when searching to find out if I was the only one to notice this, I found this post on a forum where someone finds the same issue, but prefers the cooler screen of his Leica M240 to the later M-P version of the M240 which seems to have the same warmer screen as my M262. Got a spare lottery ticket? It seemed it was not much larger than an M7; that, alone, was enough to make me decide I would own one someday. It is the successor to the world's first full-frame mirrorless camera, the LEICA M9 of 2009.. I just picked up a Leica M-P Typ 240 to compliment my new M9-P I bought a couple weeks ago. The colour differences between the two are due to slightly different colour handling in the camera and can be cancelled out completely by the camera profiles in LR. Seems I do once again. It does this by digitally enhancing the image output. This is an inspiring and generous website. I have gotten perfectly good images with the M-240 at ISO 2000 and at 3200 the images are still manageable with a small amount of noise reduction in LR. I am seeing a few posts by M262 / M-D owners stating that there is slightly improved image quality and even less banding at higher ISOs on the M262 series cameras. Even though this image set was only intentionally overexposed by a single stop in direct sunlight, the highlights from the image samples taken by the Leica M246 and the Leica M Monochrom were blown and unrecoverable in post processing. I am including these 2 images taken from the same spot focusing on the same scene. I wish I could afford him moreI often find myself agreeing with him too. I didn't do any critical tests, but I feel the M262 may have around one stop advantage at high iso. A raw image file contains minimally processed data from the image sensor. But the I needed a 21mm for crowd shots and discovered the live view is awesome for this. Very interesting. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_12',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); As it turned out, I would find more advantages with the Leica M262 when I got it. Theres been a couple of times when Ive picked the camera up one after using it in lower light and ended up shooting a whole loads of frames at a high ISO before twigging that the chosen shutter speed seems too high. It was the same shape as the M262 I was used to, maybe a touch heavier, but not really noticeably in the hand. Press and hold, select ISO, and release to lock in the setting. Expanded ISO allows you to go beyond the native ISO. (Leica M (Typ 262)) CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies. Completely agree I really thought thats what they were going to do. When I was looking at replacing my M9 with a newer model which I did in large part for the benefit of a better screen on the back I chose to skip the Leica M240 due to the fact that I didnt feel like the swathe of features it had compared to the later M262 offered me any advantage. The Digital Leica M Samples Gallery (Any digital M from M8 to M-D 262) Below are all images taken with a digital Leica M from the 240 to the m_P to the M-D, the latest and greatest M Rangefinders from Leica Camera. Another M10 fetish is better performance at high ISO. You cannot paste images directly. Damn digital cameras I can control film camera GAS quite well these days, but these digital buggers still get me! This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash. Why poor white balance, plus bad color in JPEG files, for Q2 camera? Im still getting used to it, but for me a 2 issues, weight with a big 50mm lens and editing the files you really bring out the image quality as it seems a bit flat to me. Of course Im now retired and not doing imaging for a living. I think, at least, Ive not tried one either . It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M . I upgrade cameras, selling them and adding a little bit of funds from what disposable income I do have, also relying on credit a bit too much. Now, Im writing this after my M262 has come back from Germany (it only took a couple of months!! Theres a certain robustness or heft to the M240/M262 files that I personally dont see in the M10 files, and that is likely a result of the different sensors used in the cameras. Thankfully with the M10 theyve returned to the old system. In fact, for this very reason the Leica M262 has actually presented me with the least inspiration so far. All features aside, my lust was triggered by the drastic reduction in size. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didn't need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. I wont go into too much more detail now, but for saying that unlike the M240 and M262 that Ive otherwise used since the M9, the Leica M10-P really feels like it has [].